Tatonka ALASKA 3.235 PU vs Hilleberg Nammatj 3 GT (2023)
In this article, we compare Tatonka - ALASKA 3.235 PU with the Hilleberg - Nammatj 3 GT. Take a deep look at each specification to figure out which tent is best for you.
Sleeping Capacity
Brand
Seasons
Design
Entry
Materials
Includes Poles?
Tatonka - ALASKA 3.235 PU
Tatonka
3
4
Tunnel
Front & Side
Yes
Nammatj 3 GT
Hilleberg
3
4
Tunnel
Front
Yes
# Vestibules
Purpose
Inner Height
Min. Weight
Weight
1
1
Alpine
Alpine
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Water Rating
Inner Length
Inner Width
Water Rating
Water Rating
Water Rating
Water Rating
Water Rating
Water Rating
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Water Rating
Tatonka - ALASKA 3.235 PU
Hilleberg - Nammatj 3 GT
Brand
Tatonka
Hilleberg
Pro's
Con's
Sleeping Capacity
3
3
Seasons
4
4
Purpose
Alpine
Alpine
Design
Tunnel
Tunnel
Weight (grams)
4500
4100
Min. Weight (grams)
4200
3400
Water Head Rating (ml)
8000
5500
Floor Water Rating (ml)
10000
20000
Length Inner (mm)
2350
2200
Width Inner (mm)
1650
1600
Height Inner (mm)
1100
1050
Number of vestibules
1
1
Entry Type
Front & Side
Front & Side
Pitching Order
Outer First or Together
Outer First or Together
Includes Poles?
Yes
Yes